Ticket #16410 (closed enhancement: wontfix)
gcc45: do java and gfortran need to conflict?
| Reported by: | ryandesign@… | Owned by: | mww@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 1.6.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | gcc45 |
Description
The java and gfortran variants are marked as conflicting with one another. Should that be necessary? Would the attached patch work to allow these two variants to be used together? (I have not tested yet it because it takes a long time to compile.)
Attachments
Change History
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by anonymous
- Milestone Port Enhancements deleted
Milestone Port Enhancements deleted
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by ryandesign@…
- Port set to gcc45
- Summary changed from gcc44: do java and gfortran need to conflict? to gcc45: do java and gfortran need to conflict?
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by blb@…
Isn't this just an issue while the given version is still in active development? Especially since the conflicts went away with 4.4 after it was released?
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by mww@…
- Status changed from new to closed
- Resolution set to wontfix
I suppose there are extremely few people out there who use an experimental version of gcc for both Java and Fortran development; if the behaviour of gcc45 is a problem to someone, go ahead and change it! (meanwhile I'll mark this one as wontfix, as I do not see a real need for this enhancement)
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.