Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#16410 closed enhancement (wontfix)
gcc45: do java and gfortran need to conflict?
| Reported by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | Owned by: | mww@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 1.6.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | gcc45 |
Description
The java and gfortran variants are marked as conflicting with one another. Should that be necessary? Would the attached patch work to allow these two variants to be used together? (I have not tested yet it because it takes a long time to compile.)
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
Changed 16 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Attachment: | gcc44.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by (none)
| Milestone: | Port Enhancements |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Port: | gcc45 added |
|---|---|
| Summary: | gcc44: do java and gfortran need to conflict? → gcc45: do java and gfortran need to conflict? |
comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by blb@…
Isn't this just an issue while the given version is still in active development? Especially since the conflicts went away with 4.4 after it was released?
comment:5 Changed 15 years ago by mww@…
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
I suppose there are extremely few people out there who use an experimental version of gcc for both Java and Fortran development; if the behaviour of gcc45 is a problem to someone, go ahead and change it! (meanwhile I'll mark this one as wontfix, as I do not see a real need for this enhancement)
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Milestone Port Enhancements deleted