Ticket #17538 (closed submission: fixed)
py25-protobuf-2.0.3 new port
| Reported by: | stromnov@… | Owned by: | blair@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 1.6.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | py25-protobuf |
Description
Obsoletes #16771
Attachments
Change History
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by blair@…
I'm thinking we should name this protobuf-py25 instead. There are a many ports of protobufs to other languages and having a protobuf-XXX would be more consistent. There's already a protobuf-c Port.
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by blair@…
And can you supply the necessary code to run the test suite? Then it should be good for me to commit it.
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by stromnov@…
I'd attached two new files:
- protobuf-py.Portfile - new portfile with changed naming scheme to protobuf-py
- py-protobuf-test.tar.gz - simple test code (adapted from protobuf/examples)
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by blair@…
- Status changed from new to closed
- Resolution set to fixed
Thanks, fixed in r43625 and r43630. Also added 2.4 port in r43631. I didn't make a 2.6 port since there is no MacPorts group for Python 2.6 yet, but this may be coming in 1.7 (I haven't checked).
The port is named protobuf-python25.
When I asked for a test suite, I assumed there was one provided in the package already you could just run, but that turned out not to be the case, so thanks for writing it.