Ticket #21712 (closed submission: fixed)
New port for drush - the DRUpal SHell
| Reported by: | chuck@… | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | jann@…, ryandesign@… | |
| Port: | drush |
Description
This is a new port for drush, the DRUpal SHell which can be used with Drupal. I've added in a dependency for Drupal, since drush isn't very useful without it. It isn't a pure dependency, though, so there's a nodrupal variant as well.
Attachments
Change History
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by macsforever2000@…
- Version 1.8.1 deleted
- Type changed from enhancement to submission
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by bjd@…
I've installed this port. It works as described and is very useful!
The dependency on drupal6 makes sense... I guess it's not a huge cost for those of us who don't use MacPorts to install Drupal.
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ description Changed 3 years ago by chuck@…
Replying to chuck@…:
This is a new port for drush, the DRUpal SHell which can be used with Drupal. I've added in a dependency for Drupal, since drush isn't very useful without it. It isn't a pure dependency, though, so there's a nodrupal variant as well.
Updated the port for the new version of drush, also swapped around the dependency on Drupal vs. the nondrupal variant. Default is not to depend on Drupal since Drupal core can be downloaded with drush. There are now variants to install Drupal 5 or Drupal 6 as dependencies.
comment:5 Changed 3 years ago by jann@…
- Cc jann@… added
Why do you need to call drush in post-activate ?
comment:6 follow-up: ↓ 7 Changed 3 years ago by chuck@…
There was a reason when I was testing out the port - though I'm not 100% sure what it was. I think it had to do with some self-initialization Drush does on its first run. I'll do some revalidation of that.
comment:7 in reply to: ↑ 6 Changed 3 years ago by chuck@…
Replying to chuck@…:
There was a reason when I was testing out the port - though I'm not 100% sure what it was. I think it had to do with some self-initialization Drush does on its first run. I'll do some revalidation of that.
It does not appear to be needed with the latest drush. I've updated the port file.
comment:8 Changed 3 years ago by jann@…
- Status changed from new to closed
- Resolution set to fixed
Committed in r61786. Thanks.
comment:10 in reply to: ↑ 9 Changed 3 years ago by chuck@…
Replying to ryandesign@…:
I made some small adjustments:
Thanks. Much cleaner. I had mimicked another port on the destroot information. This works out a lot more simply.
comment:11 Changed 3 years ago by ryandesign@…
Yes, I have noticed that destroot idiom in other www ports as well. They should all be cleaned up.