Opened 14 years ago

Closed 14 years ago

#23615 closed update (fixed)

kmymoney-1.0.0 : update port to more current version of kmymoney

Reported by: mkae (Marko Käning) Owned by: ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version:
Keywords: Cc:
Port: kmymoney

Description

It would be worthwhile to update kmymoney (as well as kmm_banking) to a newer version.

(There is also a version for kde4 around!)

Attachments (1)

Portfile-kmymoney.diff​ (1.4 KB) - added by mkae (Marko Käning) 14 years ago.
Added sha1 checksum.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (7)

comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)

Keywords: kmymoney kde removed
Type: enhancement → update
Version: 1.8.2

comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)

I attached Portfile-kmymoney.diff which

  • now builds and installs kmymoney's latest version 1.0.3
  • offers variant withoutofx (in case you do not need OFX support for some reason)
  • now also has port kde as a dependency (see #23614)

Since I am new to MacPorts I don't know whether my email address shall go into the maintainers field...

I created only a md5 checksum so far.

comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)

BTW, kmm_banking is currently up-to-date!

Changed 14 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)

Attachment: Portfile-kmymoney.diff​ added

Added sha1 checksum.

comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)

Cc: ryandesign@… removed
Owner: changed from macports-tickets@… to ryandesign@…
Status: new → assigned

comment:5 in reply to:  2 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)

Replying to MK-MacPorts@…:

  • now builds and installs kmymoney's latest version 1.0.3

Thanks, committed in r64092.

  • offers variant withoutofx (in case you do not need OFX support for some reason)

I didn't add this variant yet. Could you explain what the benefit is of building without OFX support? If there is a significant benefit to offering this option, the variant should be called "no_ofx" for consistency with existing MacPorts naming conventions.

Since I am new to MacPorts I don't know whether my email address shall go into the maintainers field...

Your email address should go into the maintainers field if you want to maintain this port. Do you? If so, I'll make this change. If not, we can leave it at nomaintainer.

comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)

Resolution: → fixed
Status: assigned → closed

Marko indicated by email that yes, he would like to maintain. Done in r64097. I'll resolve this ticket now. Any further changes should occur in new tickets.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.