Opened 9 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

#46026 closed defect (worksforme)

py27-scientific needs py27-netcdf4

Reported by: Schamschula (Marius Schamschula) Owned by: seanfarley (Sean Farley)
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 2.3.3
Keywords: haspatch Cc: petrrr
Port: py27-scientific

Description

Even though py27-scientific has netcdf as a depends_lib, it also needs py27-netcdf4. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651502

Attachments (1)

Portfile-py27-scientific.diff (699 bytes) - added by Schamschula (Marius Schamschula) 9 years ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (8)

comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)

Cc: sean@… removed
Owner: changed from macports-tickets@… to sean@…

comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by seanfarley (Sean Farley)

Ah, nice. I'll look at this Soon™.

comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by petrrr

Cc: petr@… added

Cc Me!

comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by petrrr

BTW: Is the port:netcdf dependency really needed? Does py27-scientific link against netcdf or is py27-netcdf4 sufficient as dependency?

comment:5 in reply to:  4 ; Changed 9 years ago by Schamschula (Marius Schamschula)

Replying to petr@…:

BTW: Is the port:netcdf dependency really needed? Does py27-scientific link against netcdf or is py27-netcdf4 sufficient as dependency?

I know that the build failed w/o py27-netcdf4. However, netcdf is a dependency of py27-netcdf4…

So I think it is safe to remove netcdf from depends_lib-append.

Changed 9 years ago by Schamschula (Marius Schamschula)

comment:6 in reply to:  5 Changed 9 years ago by Schamschula (Marius Schamschula)

Replying to mschamschula@…:

Replying to petr@…:

BTW: Is the port:netcdf dependency really needed? Does py27-scientific link against netcdf or is py27-netcdf4 sufficient as dependency?

I know that the build failed w/o py27-netcdf4. However, netcdf is a dependency of py27-netcdf4…

So I think it is safe to remove netcdf from depends_lib-append.

Removed netcdf dependency.

comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by seanfarley (Sean Farley)

Resolution: worksforme
Status: newclosed

This is fixed in the new version of Scientific Python, so I'm marking this closed. Though, parts of Scientific Python are now broken due to numpy 1.9 :-/

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.