Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#46797 closed update (fixed)
whizard @2.2.3_0: update to 2.2.4, default to `+gcc49` variant, add `+gcc5` variant
| Reported by: | Romendakil | Owned by: | larryv (Lawrence Velázquez) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | haspatch maintainer | Cc: | whizard@… |
| Port: | whizard |
Description (last modified by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez))
Update Port whizard (science) from its version 2.2.3 to 2.2.4.
Adding gcc5 as possible build compiler, switching default compiler from 4.8 to 4.9.
Attachments (3)
Change History (13)
Changed 9 years ago by Romendakil
| Attachment: | Portfile-whizard.diff added |
|---|
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
| Cc: | whizard@… added |
|---|---|
| Description: | modified (diff) |
| Keywords: | haspatch maintainer added; Port version update removed |
| Summary: | Update Port whizard (science) → whizard @2.2.3_0: update to 2.2.4, default to `+gcc49` variant, add `+gcc5` variant |
| Version: | 2.3.3 |
comment:5 follow-up: 6 Changed 9 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
With gcc 5, the version numbering scheme has changed. Whereas we had gcc 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, we will in the future have gcc 5, 6, 7, etc.
So the description for the gcc5 variant should mention gcc 5 (not gcc 5.0), and the configure.compiler directive should specify macports-gcc-5 (not macports-gcc-5.0).
The section that sets the default_variants to +gcc49 should be updated to not do so if the gcc5 variant has already been selected.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by Romendakil
Replying to ryandesign@…:
With gcc 5, the version numbering scheme has changed. Whereas we had gcc 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, we will in the future have gcc 5, 6, 7, etc.
So the description for the gcc5 variant should mention gcc 5 (not gcc 5.0), and the
configure.compilerdirective should specifymacports-gcc-5(notmacports-gcc-5.0).The section that sets the
default_variantsto+gcc49should be updated to not do so if the gcc5 variant has already been selected.
Hey, thanks for the remarks. I updated the Portfile accordingly.
Changed 9 years ago by Romendakil
| Attachment: | Portfile-whizard.2.diff added |
|---|
New diff for Portfiles including remarks from ryandesign@…
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by Romendakil
What is the status of this? On next week's Friday we will release v2.2.5 of our software. Shall I then immediately provide the new portfile for 2.2.5?
Changed 9 years ago by Romendakil
| Attachment: | Portfile-whizard.3.diff added |
|---|
Patch for Portfile from WHIZARD v2.2.3 -> v2.2.5
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by Romendakil
As I said, now our version 2.2.5 of WHIZARD is out. I attached the patch for the Portfile from version 2.2.3 to the new version 2.2.5. Hope that this is ok, and that you could update this now on a short time scale. Thanks a lot.
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to larryv@… |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
Thanks, and sorry for the delay. In the future, please email macports-dev to get the attention of a committer.
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Patch file for whizard port update