Opened 9 years ago
Last modified 9 years ago
#47775 new submission
libint2 @2.0.3 replace previous submission
| Reported by: | tczorro (Derrick) | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.3.3 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | libint2 |
Description
Libint2 was submitted several days ago which is named libint. However, because libint and libint2 are not compatible so this could cause some unexpected problems.
So here I hope to replace its name libint with libint2.
Attachments (2)
Change History (4)
Changed 9 years ago by tczorro (Derrick)
| Attachment: | Portfile_libint2 added |
|---|
Changed 9 years ago by tczorro (Derrick)
| Attachment: | Portfile_libint added |
|---|
ORIGINAL libint Portfile
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 9 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Keywords: | rename libint removed |
|---|
Do we then expect to add a libint port later, for libint version 1? Is that needed for anything? We could just as easily keep the existing libint port at version 2, and add a libint1 port if it is ever needed later.
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by tczorro (Derrick)
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Do we then expect to add a libint port later, for libint version 1? Is that needed for anything? We could just as easily keep the existing libint port at version 2, and add a libint1 port if it is ever needed later.
Just in case some package still use the old libint1 version get confused about this libint2 version like CP2K.
Is it possible to have 2 version libint port in macport at the same time?
Portfile for libint2