#15824 closed enhancement (wontfix)
add 'no_sasl' variant to subversion
| Reported by: | ghosthound | Owned by: | danielluke (Daniel J. Luke) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 1.6.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: |
Description
attached patch adds a 'no_sasl' variant to subversion for those that don't want to build subversion with sasl2 support.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
Changed 16 years ago by ghosthound
| Attachment: | subversionNoSASLVariant.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Milestone: | → Port Enhancements |
|---|---|
| Type: | defect → enhancement |
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by danielluke (Daniel J. Luke)
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
Is there an actual reason to build without sasl support (other than irrational hatred of cyrus-sasl2? :-) )
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by ghosthound
Besides the irrational hatredWWissues with cyrus-sasl2, if one doesn't need it, then why bother building it and linking it in?
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by ghosthound
(feh, the formatting did something weird to the two ctrl-W characters...)
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by danielluke (Daniel J. Luke)
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
The ctrl-W looked good in the email, though.
Mainly I want to avoid extra variants as they just make it harder to make sure that the port works as expected for people (any no_ variant needs to exist for the subversion bindings ports too, so there's extra effort and testing there as well).
I'm inclined to mark this WONTFIX, but will certainly entertain arguments to add the variant.
comment:6 Changed 15 years ago by (none)
| Milestone: | Port Enhancements |
|---|
Milestone Port Enhancements deleted
patch to devel/subversion/Portfile to add no_sasl variant