Opened 16 years ago

Last modified 19 months ago

#16357 assigned defect

xemacs-21.4.21 newer port looks much worse than older port?

Reported by: schneck@… Owned by: dstrubbe (David Strubbe)
Priority: Low Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 1.6.0
Keywords: xemacs font sumo mule Cc: cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Port: xemacs

Description

The older port of xemacs (which I installed +sumo but without mule) looks good to me The newer port (which automatically comes with sumo and mule) looks bad---the font just looks poor in comparison, as if poorly bitmapped or something...

Is this something to do with mule? Perhaps a no_mule option for those who want sumo but not mule could be made available.

Change History (6)

comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)

Cc: mww@… removed
Owner: changed from macports-tickets@… to mww@…
Port: xemacs added

comment:2 in reply to:  description Changed 15 years ago by schneck@…

I verified today (2009-03-05) that XEmacs from MacPorts looks very different with and without mule support.

I also figured out what to add to my .xemacs/init.el to get the mule version to look the same as the non-mule version:

(set-face-font
     'default
     '("-*-courier-medium-r-*-*-*-120-*"))

comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by (none)

Milestone: Port Bugs

Milestone Port Bugs deleted

comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)

Owner: changed from mww@… to macports-tickets@…

comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)

Owner: changed from macports-tickets@… to dstrubbe
Status: newassigned

comment:6 Changed 19 months ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)

Cc: cooljeanius added
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.