Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#37087 new enhancement
kdelibs4 mobile profile
| Reported by: | yue.liu@… | Owned by: | NicosPavlov |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | haspatch | Cc: | |
| Port: | kdelibs4 |
Description
I added mobile variant to kdelibs4. Normally nobody will use mobile profile on OSX, this variant is for kde app developers who want to make an app bundle or standalone installer using libraries compiled from macports, and keep the bundle/pkg as small as possible. This will work for those kde apps that can compile with mobile profiled kdelibs4, such as Calligra. Patches are inherited from meego project. Currently I disabled soprano and nepomuk in this variant because they cause compilation failure.
Attachments (8)
Change History (12)
Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
| Attachment: | kdelibs4-mobile-variant.patch added |
|---|
Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
| Attachment: | include_solid.patch added |
|---|
Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
| Attachment: | kdewebkit_mobile_fix.patch added |
|---|
inherited from meego project
Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
| Attachment: | kparts-linkinterface-nepomuk.patch added |
|---|
inherited from meego project
Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
| Attachment: | nepomuk_install_deprecated.patch added |
|---|
inherited from meego project
Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
| Attachment: | nepomuk-no-duplicatetags.patch added |
|---|
inherited from meego project
Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
| Attachment: | plasma-active-patches.patch added |
|---|
inherited from meego project
Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
| Attachment: | no-kparts-genericfactory.patch added |
|---|
inherited from meego project
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Cc: | sharky@… added |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | haspatch added |
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to nicos@… |
| Version: | 2.1.2 |
In the future, please remember to Cc the port maintainer(s).
comment:2 follow-up: 3 Changed 8 years ago by NicosPavlov
Since this variant would disable both Soprano and Nepomuk, it would break many ports which then depend on kdelibs4. It is an open question, but in this case, would not it be a better idea to make it a separate port conflicting with the present kdelibs4 instead of a variant ? This would prevent to break the tree dependence.
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by yue.liu@…
Replying to nicos@…:
Since this variant would disable both Soprano and Nepomuk, it would break many ports which then depend on kdelibs4. It is an open question, but in this case, would not it be a better idea to make it a separate port conflicting with the present kdelibs4 instead of a variant ? This would prevent to break the tree dependence.
Maybe subport should be used? I'm not sure how it works yet.
comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by sharky@…
| Cc: | sharky@… removed |
|---|
inherited from meego project