Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#40071 closed update (fixed)
vim/vim-app @7.3.762_2, MacVim @7.3.snapshot66_3: update to 7.4 (MacVim snapshot 70)
| Reported by: | larryv (Lawrence Velázquez) | Owned by: | raimue (Rainer Müller) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | christianlaustsen@…, cooljeanius (Eric Gallager), g5pw (Aljaž Srebrnič), nonstop.server@…, dcecchin@… | |
| Port: | vim MacVim vim-app |
Description
Vim 7.4 stable has been released. I’ll provide a patch later today or tomorrow, unless you already have something cooking.
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by christianlaustsen@…
| Cc: | christianlaustsen@… added |
|---|
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 11 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
I will definitely get to this, need to catch up with some other stuff first. For new stable releases I tend to test the different variants more thoroughly.
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Replying to raimue@…:
I will definitely get to this, need to catch up with some other stuff first. For new stable releases I tend to test the different variants more thoroughly.
Sounds good. I worked a bit on vim, if you want to take a look.
- A couple of patches have been obsoleted by upstream fixes. Notably, the configure script seems to respect
CCnow. - At least one Python variant (python27) fails to produce a correctly-linked vim due to the configure script incorrectly using LINKFORSHARED. I fixed the build by using
pythonX.Y-configinstead, but I didn’t kick the tires. - Even with the existing patch, the configure script finds the wrong Tcl unless
--with-tclshis used.
comment:8 follow-up: 9 Changed 11 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
Thanks a lot for your work, Larry! First batch of changes from your branch landed in r110123. However, it's not the upgrade to 7.4 yet.
By the way, I did not use the same file for +python2x and +python3x as with a selection of both at the same time, the patch phase fails trying to apply the same patch twice (patchfiles-append does not ensure the list is unique).
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Replying to raimue@…:
Thanks a lot for your work, Larry! First batch of changes from your branch landed in r110123.
Great!
By the way, I did not use the same file for +python2x and +python3x as with a selection of both at the same time, the patch phase fails trying to apply the same patch twice (
patchfiles-appenddoes not ensure the list is unique).
Ah, I hadn’t even considered trying those variants at the same time. Makes sense.
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Cc Me!