Opened 19 years ago

Closed 19 years ago

Last modified 19 years ago

#4259 closed defect (fixed)

UPDATE: cvsweb-2.0.6

Reported by: dports@… Owned by: macports-tickets@…
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 1.0
Keywords: Cc:
Port:

Description

cvsweb-2.0.6

http://www.freebsd.org/projects/cvsweb.html

cvsweb 2.0.6 does not seem to work on Tiger, though it compiles and installs fine. I updated the Port to 3.05 and now it seems to work fine. I think it is generally undesirable for Ports to place stuff outside of $ {prefix}, but the original author did this, and I'm not sure what is a better way to handle this right now. If I can help improve it, in this revision or a future one, just let me know how it should be done.

Mark

Attachments (4)

Portfile.diff (2.1 KB) - added by dports@… 19 years ago.
Updated cvsweb Portfile
Portfile.2.diff (3.3 KB) - added by dports@… 19 years ago.
Updated cvsweb Portfile diff
Portfile.3.diff (3.3 KB) - added by dports@… 19 years ago.
Updated cvsweb Portfile diff
Portfile (2.6 KB) - added by dports@… 19 years ago.
Here's full Portfile in case it is needed

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (7)

Changed 19 years ago by dports@…

Attachment: Portfile.diff added

Updated cvsweb Portfile

Changed 19 years ago by dports@…

Attachment: Portfile.2.diff added

Updated cvsweb Portfile diff

Changed 19 years ago by dports@…

Attachment: Portfile.3.diff added

Updated cvsweb Portfile diff

comment:1 Changed 19 years ago by dports@…

attachments.isobsolete: 01

Changed 19 years ago by dports@…

Attachment: Portfile added

Here's full Portfile in case it is needed

comment:2 Changed 19 years ago by olegb@…

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

Mark, would you be willing to maintain this ?

(commited)

comment:3 Changed 19 years ago by dports@…

(In reply to comment #5)

Mark, would you be willing to maintain this ?

(commited)

Yes, though I'd feel a little better if the "where to put Apache stuff" issue were resolved since I think the port has some undesirable behavior as referenced in these threads. But I can't see that consensus has yet emerged on how to handle it, though some discussion has happened.

http://www.opendarwin.org/pipermail/darwinports/2005-August/027108.html http://www.opendarwin.org/pipermail/darwinports/2005-August/027112.html

But I could update it if/when the discussion gets further so go ahead and make me the maintainer. Thanks.

Mark

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.