Opened 10 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

Last modified 10 years ago

#44264 closed defect (fixed)

texlive: texlive-games should depend on texlive-generic-extra

Reported by: akimd (Akim Demaille) Owned by: drkp (Dan Ports)
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 2.3.1
Keywords: Cc: cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Port: texlive-games

Description

The code of skak.sty (part of texlive-games) reads:

%% changed by UF to stop a clash with \And of amsmath,
%%  also changed every occurance of \And to
%% \LambdaAnd in this sty-file.
\let\Ori@nd\And
\RequirePackage{lambda,ifthen,calc,textcomp}
\let\LambdaAnd\And
\let\And\Ori@nd

i.e., it now depends on lambda.sty which is part of lambda-lists, which is part of texlive-generic-extra.

Change History (8)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)

Cc: egall@… added

Cc Me!

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)

Remember to cc the maintainer (port info --maintainers texlive-games, who in this case is the same person as does most of the other texlive ports as well)

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by akimd (Akim Demaille)

Well, dports@… looked like a non real email, and last time I had added such a email, I was told not to (#44221)...

Comment:

Please do not Cc openmaintainer@… because it is not a valid email address.

I have more fun things to do than checking each time what is and what is not a real address. port should filter itself.

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)

Owner: changed from macports-tickets@… to dports@…

Did you actually read the link? dports is a real person and should be Cc'ed. openmaintainer is not.

comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by akimd (Akim Demaille)

Yes, I read it, _last_time_. My claim is that submitting a bug report should be easy, and having to check what are the right emails is not. Especially when there is no patterns in the emails.

Actually, what does it give to put as a maintainer an email that we are not supposed to use?

comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

Status: newassigned

Yes, we really should automatically assign tickets to the right maintainer for a port instead of expecting them to figure it out themselves. There was talk on one of the mailing lists about building a trac plugin to do this...

As for the actual bug, sounds like a missing dependency in the texlive package database. We can fix that manually.

comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

Fixed in r122117.

comment:8 in reply to:  6 Changed 10 years ago by akimd (Akim Demaille)

Replying to dports@…:

As for the actual bug, sounds like a missing dependency in the texlive package database. We can fix that manually.

Does that mean that I should send a bug report upstream? Or did you?

Thanks!

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.