Opened 9 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#45959 closed submission (wontfix)
Portfile for Salt 2014.7.0
| Reported by: | cro (C. R. Oldham) | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.3.3 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | nerdling (Jeremy Lavergne), macports@… | |
| Port: | salt |
Description
Attached is a Portfile for 2014.7.0. This port depends on raet (ticket #45958), ioflo (ticket #45957), libnacl (ticket #45898), and libsodium (already present in MacPorts).
Both this version and the version for 2014.1.13 (ticket #44300) should be included in MacPorts as some users may wish to stay with the pre-2014.7 branch until 2014.7.xx has matured a little more.
Attachments (1)
Change History (11)
Changed 9 years ago by cro (C. R. Oldham)
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Replying to cr@…:
Both this version and the version for 2014.1.13 (ticket #44300) should be included in MacPorts as some users may wish to stay with the pre-2014.7 branch until 2014.7.xx has matured a little more.
Then the ports will need different names. There can only be one copy of a portfile of a given name in the repository at a time.
comment:3 follow-up: 4 Changed 9 years ago by cro (C. R. Oldham)
I'm confused then, can't different versions co-exist?
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by nerdling (Jeremy Lavergne)
Replying to cr@…:
The packages need different names if you want them available separate (e.g. salt-2014.1 and salt-2014.7). Otherwise, a user should checkout an old version of the Portfile to get the old definition.
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by cro (C. R. Oldham)
Oh, OK. I don't need them separate. We can direct folks to the right place if they need 2014.1.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
You could also go with a salt / salt-devel setup, where salt is the stable version and salt-devel is a development version. By convention, the ports would conflict with each other and be interchangeable (e.g., would provide the same files). See libgcc and libgcc-devel, for example.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by cro (C. R. Oldham)
@larryv I might consider that for a 'salt-git' port sometime in the future. For now I'm just eager to get 2014.7 in MacPorts.
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by hahn.seb@…
The attached patch suffers from the same problem that the 2014.1.13 suffered from. Is there now a consensus what the naming should be for this? Shall I provide an updated Portfile for 2014.7.2 and we're done with it?
comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
The salt port already exists and is at version 2017.5.
Portfile for Salt 2014.7.0