git-flow update: bump subport git-flow-avh v1.7.0 -> v1.8.0

[gorticus (Jason Mitchell)]

Gitflow AVH edition v1.8.0 was released 2014-10-01. Update Portfile with new release version.

[mf2k (Frank Schima)]

Thanks. The revision line should be deleted because it starts at 0 when increasing the version and that is the default value.

[ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)]

Why doesn't this subport fetch from a distfile? The other three subports use git submodule update --init, which is a valid reason to use fetch.type git, but git-flow-avh doesn't.

[gorticus (Jason Mitchell)]

Portfile patch, addresses comment:1

[gorticus (Jason Mitchell)]

Replying to mf2k@…:

Thanks. The revision line should be deleted because it starts at 0 when increasing the version and that is the default value.

Removed, patch updated.

[gorticus (Jason Mitchell)]

Replying to ryandesign@…:

Why doesn't this subport fetch from a distfile? The other three subports use git submodule update --init, which is a valid reason to use fetch.type git, but git-flow-avh doesn't.

Combination limited time and ignorance on my part. A quick peek at github-1.0.tcl showed no github.tarball_from option matched the github.master_sites results in the switch switch for the archive focused URL in ​gitflow AVH's release page. Since github-1.0.tcl specifically mentions github.master_sites expects a simple string and not a list, I fumbled to build a recipe for the right tarball_from. The clone worked, so I stuck with it.

[ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)]

Correct, the github portgroup does not have an option for archive URLs yet, because nobody has yet come up with a reason to do so. See #40518.

[kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)]

Cc Me!

[kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)]

done and I also changed to use distfiles r137258