Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#47833 closed submission (fixed)
new port: macvim-devel
| Reported by: | harciga | Owned by: | raimue (Rainer Müller) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.3.3 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | macvim-devel |
Description
Attachments (8)
Change History (14)
Changed 9 years ago by harciga
| Attachment: | patch-compat-sigaltstack.diff added |
|---|
Changed 9 years ago by harciga
| Attachment: | patch-MacVim-GCC-VERSION.diff added |
|---|
Changed 9 years ago by harciga
| Attachment: | patch-python.diff added |
|---|
Changed 9 years ago by harciga
| Attachment: | patch-python3.diff added |
|---|
Changed 9 years ago by harciga
| Attachment: | patch-ruby.diff added |
|---|
Changed 9 years ago by harciga
| Attachment: | patch-src-MacVim-icons-python.diff added |
|---|
Changed 9 years ago by harciga
| Attachment: | patch-tcl.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 9 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to raimue@… |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by harciga
Replying to larryv@…:
I don’t think it makes sense to introduce a new Vim-related port that has a different maintainer than the other three. We have had other ports in this situation (
wiresharkandwireshark-develcome to mind), and the ports tend to diverge.
I don't care about ownership, if raimue doesn't mind I could submit a ticket for this as a MacVim subport. I put in an openmaintainer, I don't see the problem with ownership.
Regarding divergence, it's the same codebase, from the same devs, with basically the same patches.
I just find the latest MacVim stable release too old (Apri 21, 2014 with patch 7.4.316).
Changed 9 years ago by harciga
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 9 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
Is there any feature you are missing from the current MacVim?
I see this updates to a newer snapshot. It would be totally fine to just update MacVim to the newer snapshot. I prefer to keep MacVim and vim in sync in terms of patch level to make sure users can always use the same .vimrc.
Although I have to admit and apologize that I slacked a bit and did not keep up with the MacVim releases from the new maintainer.
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by harciga
Replying to raimue@…:
Is there any feature you are missing from the current MacVim?
No, I don't think so.
I see this updates to a newer snapshot. It would be totally fine to just update MacVim to the newer snapshot. I prefer to keep MacVim and vim in sync in terms of patch level to make sure users can always use the same .vimrc.
Great.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
I don’t think it makes sense to introduce a new Vim-related port that has a different maintainer than the other three. We have had other ports in this situation (
wiresharkandwireshark-develcome to mind), and the ports tend to diverge.