qca @2.1.0_1 fails during install phase

[udbraumann]

While upgrading qca from 2.1.0_0 to 2.1.0_1 I run in this trouble during install phase:

...
:notice:install --->  Installing qca @2.1.0_1+qt4
:debug:install Can't run install on this port without elevated privileges. Escalating privileges back to root.
:debug:install euid changed to: 0. egid changed to: 0.
:debug:install Executing org.macports.install (qca)
:debug:install Using /usr/bin/tar
:debug:install Using /usr/bin/bzip2
:error:install org.macports.install for port qca returned: can't read "description": wrong # args: should be "set varName ?newValue?"
:debug:install Error code: NONE
:debug:install Backtrace: wrong # args: should be "set varName ?newValue?"
    while executing
"set description Qt Cryptographic Architecture"
    ("uplevel" body line 1)
    invoked from within
"uplevel #0 set $optionName $option_defaults($optionName)"
    (procedure "default_check" line 11)
    invoked from within
"default_check description {} r"
    (read trace on "description")
    invoked from within
"set $option"
    (procedure "option" line 10)
    invoked from within
"option description"
    (procedure "create_archive" line 134)
    invoked from within
"create_archive $location $portarchivetype"
    (procedure "portinstall::install_main" line 22)
    invoked from within
"portinstall::install_main org.macports.install"
    ("eval" body line 1)
    invoked from within
"eval $procedure $targetname"
:info:install Warning: targets not executed for qca: org.macports.install
...

Some ideas?

[michaelld (Michael Dickens)]

Might be fixed in r145256. Please clean, selfupdate, and updating again.

[jmroot (Joshua Root)]

That won't have fixed it. The problem comes from incorrect use of "default". There's no reason to use it on description and long_description though, as there is no lazy evaluation being done. So I would suggest simply removing it.

[cjones051073 (Chris Jones)]

I can confirm the issue was not fixed in r145256, and that removing the incorrect 'default' specifiers in the descriptions fixes things.

[cjones051073 (Chris Jones)]

Cc Me!

[michaelld (Michael Dickens)]

OK; very good. Done in r145272. The other change needed to happen anyway; sloppy programming the first time around on my part.