Opened 10 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#53156 closed update (fixed)
upgrade: port:Vc
| Reported by: | RJVB (René Bertin) | Owned by: | RJVB (René Bertin) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | haspatch maintainer | Cc: | chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez) |
| Port: | Vc |
Description
port:Vc has been upgraded; the attached patch brings it to 1.3.0.14 to get as much support as possible for the latest CPU models.
It also uses the Ninja generator from the cmake-1.1 PortGroup, to reduce build resource requires a bit.
Attachments (2)
Change History (17)
Changed 10 years ago by RJVB (René Bertin)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)
| Cc: | mkae added; RJVB removed |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by RJVB (René Bertin)
True, so since you raise the point: what exactly is the variable used for?
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
The installs_libs variable indicates whether the port installs any libraries. Since this port does, it should not claim installs_libs no.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by RJVB (René Bertin)
OK, but that doesn't answer the question what the information is used for.
Changed 10 years ago by RJVB (René Bertin)
upgrade and drop the installs_libs=no declaration
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)
| Cc: | mkae removed |
|---|---|
| Owner: | set to mkae |
| Status: | new → accepted |
comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)
@rjvb, I get it that this update of the Vc port needs PR #26...
comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by RJVB (René Bertin)
I think I may have been using new stuff from that PG, indeed :)
You were looking for test-cases, no? ...
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Keywords: | maintainer added |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from mkae to RJVB |
| Status: | accepted → assigned |
comment:12 Changed 8 years ago by pmetzger (Perry E. Metzger)
Howdy! Do you think you could redo this as a github pull request? It will be acted on faster that way.
comment:13 Changed 7 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
This port has since been updated to 1.4.1 (currently the latest version). I believe this ticket can be closed.
comment:14 Changed 7 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
| Cc: | chrstphrchvz added |
|---|
comment:15 Changed 5 years ago by reneeotten (Renee Otten)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
A static library is still a library, isn't it?