lmdb : update to 0.9.19

[RJVB (René Bertin)]

Please find attached an update to lmdb 0.9.19 .

[kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)]

If you're checking for darwin and linux, doesn't the platforms linux need linux in it?

platforms darwin

[RJVB (René Bertin)]

It's not needed in any strict sens of the term. I even have the impression that quite a few Portfiles that do check for other OS types (I noticed FreeBSD the other day) don't mention this in the platforms statement.

I wouldn't mind adding the info, but it can give the impression that it's non trivial to use the port on another OS or even that there's official support. Neither of those impressions would be true. In addition, there are lots of ports that work "as is" on Linux. IOW, I never know what purpose the platforms statement really serves.

FWIW we wouldn't be having this discussion if my proposition to support an else clause for the platform syntax had been implemented already ;)

[ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)]

The platforms statement serves to inform the user what platforms the port is believed to work on. MacPorts doesn't check this value, merely shows it to the user.

[chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)]

lmdb has since been updated to 0.9.22. Do any of the other proposed Portfile changes still apply, or can this be closed?

[RJVB (René Bertin)]

actually, lmdb is at 0.9.23 since a while already. The other changes are just to make the port platform-agnostic and thus not something I'm going to insist on.