NEW: procmail-3.22

[danielluke (Daniel J. Luke)]

procmail-3.22

the portfile can be found: INLINE

Description: procmail mail processing software. Version 3.22 is a bugfix release.

Homepage: ​http://www.procmail.org

Comments: This is my first attempt at a dport. Procmail 3.21 (shipped with darwin/Mac OS X) has the tendency to munge 'From' lines in mbox files under load, this is fixed with 3.22.

# $Id: $ PortSystem 1.0 name procmail version 3.22 categories mail maintainers dluke@… description procmail mail processing software long_description Procmail can be used to create mail-servers, mailing \

lists, sort your incoming mail into separate \ folders/files (real convenient when subscribing to one \ or more mailing lists or for prioritising your mail), \ preprocess your mail, start any programs upon mail \ arrival (e.g. to generate different chimes on your \ workstation for different types of mail) or \ selectively forward certain incoming mail \ automatically to someone.

homepage ​http://www.procmail.org master_sites ​http://www.procmail.org/ ​ftp://ftp.procmail.net/pub/procmail/ checksums md5 1678ea99b973eb77eda4ecf6acae53f1 platforms darwin configure {} build.args BASENAME=${destroot}${prefix} LOCKINGTEST=/tmp install.args BASENAME=${destroot}${prefix} LOCKINGTEST=/tmp install-suid

-- Daniel J. Luke dluke@…

[michaelm@…]

hmmm, I missed this one and just committed the port based on bug 661, looking at the two, yours looks cleaner (ie doesn't need patches). If you could have a look at bug 661 and comment on that and or discuss with the person that submitted that port robert@… (Robert Shaw) what changes need to be done to the committed version and who'd like to maintain this port I'd be grateful

cheers

[fkr@…]

could someone please clean up this mess with procmail? this portfile is way cleaner. -fkr

[michaelm@…]

It's been done.... the current committed version is the one agreed on by the 2 people who submitted to bugzilla, it is a hybrid of the 2, with the main difference from this one being that it uses config files in prefix/etc instead.

[fkr@…]

so, I guess this bug should have been closed then... -fkr