Context Navigation

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #58935, comment 13

initial	v1
13	13	}}}
14	14
15		This outcome makes sense. the `x86_64` architecture does not have any functions with the `$UNIX2003` tag. If I understand all of that correctly, the `x86_64` architecture was directly UNIX-certified and thus doesn't have any `$UNIX2003` functions. The `i386` architecture on the other hand wasn't certified and hence needs compatibility symbols that implement the functionality as mandated by SUS, since the "default implementation" is an Apple-specific, non-SUS-compliant one.
	15	This outcome makes sense. The `x86_64` architecture does not have any functions with the `$UNIX2003` tag. If I understand all of that correctly, the `x86_64` architecture was directly UNIX-certified and thus doesn't have any `$UNIX2003` functions. The `i386` architecture on the other hand wasn't certified and hence needs compatibility symbols that implement the functionality as mandated by SUS, since the "default implementation" is an Apple-specific, non-SUS-compliant one.
16	16
17	17	The good part is that I can just filter out variants for architectures that don't support them.