Opened 22 months ago

Closed 21 months ago

Last modified 21 months ago

#65458 closed defect (fixed)

findutils @4.9.0 +universal configure fails on Snow Leopard due to 32-bit time_t warning

Reported by: rlhamil Owned by: mascguy (Christopher Nielsen)
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 2.7.2
Keywords: pending Cc:
Port: findutils

Description

findutils +universal now may have a problem configuring where that includes 32-bit, specifically seen on Snow Leopard

:info:configure configure: error: in `/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_sysutils_findutils/findutils/work/findutils-4.9.0-i386':
:info:configure configure: error: The 'time_t' type stops working after January 2038,
:info:configure                    and your system appears to support a wider 'time_t'.
:info:configure                    Try configuring with 'CC="/opt/local/bin/clang-mp-8.0 -m64"'.
:info:configure                    To build with a 32-bit time_t anyway (not recommended),
:info:configure                    configure with '--disable-year2038'.

Change History (9)

comment:1 Changed 22 months ago by mascguy (Christopher Nielsen)

Owner: set to mascguy
Status: newassigned

comment:2 Changed 21 months ago by mascguy (Christopher Nielsen)

Cc: rlhamil@… removed

comment:3 Changed 21 months ago by mascguy (Christopher Nielsen)

This port was fixed several years ago, to ensure that configure only warns about that. And that's what I'm seeing locally, when testing on 10.5 and 10.6.

Are you using an out-of-date - or custom - portfile?

comment:4 in reply to:  3 Changed 21 months ago by mascguy (Christopher Nielsen)

Keywords: pending added

Replying to mascguy:

This port was fixed several years ago, to ensure that configure only warns about that. And that's what I'm seeing locally, when testing on 10.5 and 10.6.

Are you using an out-of-date - or custom - portfile?

Regardless, I'll add configure option --disable-year2038, to eliminate the warning entirely.

comment:5 Changed 21 months ago by rlhamil

As of when I filed it was current (as in port selfupdate or port sync) and not custom and no Portfile in the current directory then, and nothing strange on the port upgrade command line either.

comment:6 Changed 21 months ago by Christopher Nielsen <mascguy@…>

In 68bc72812c334a2f5a33f96c28e5ae1874d8afae/macports-ports (master):

findutils-devel: i386/ppc: disable year 2038 support
See: #65458

comment:7 Changed 21 months ago by Christopher Nielsen <mascguy@…>

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

In a0d28128159032f5e8d61c43b120b627cf78eab4/macports-ports (master):

findutils: i386/ppc: disable year 2038 support
Fixes: #65458

comment:8 in reply to:  3 ; Changed 21 months ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)

Replying to mascguy:

This port was fixed several years ago, to ensure that configure only warns about that. And that's what I'm seeing locally, when testing on 10.5 and 10.6.

Were you building on 64-bit hardware? I gather that it only complains if you are building 32-bit on a system that can build 64-bit.

comment:9 in reply to:  8 Changed 21 months ago by rlhamil

Replying to jmroot:

Replying to mascguy:

This port was fixed several years ago, to ensure that configure only warns about that. And that's what I'm seeing locally, when testing on 10.5 and 10.6.

Were you building on 64-bit hardware? I gather that it only complains if you are building 32-bit on a system that can build 64-bit.

Building on a Snow Leopard VM on a 64-bit Mojave host; so yes, I expect the VM was 64-bit capable. There were some thing I built universal "just in case", although I grant that findutils (since it doesn't apparently provide library/libraries) is not a particularly good example of that argument.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.