Opened 2 years ago
Closed 9 months ago
#69991 closed defect (duplicate)
lapack @3.12.0_1+accelerate+gfortran fails to build
| Reported by: | spinicist (Tobias Wood) | Owned by: | tenomoto (Takeshi Enomoto) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | Dave-Allured (Dave Allured) | |
| Port: | lapack |
Description
I am trying to use the Accelerate version of LAPACK with Eigen. According to the Eigen website, this means I need LAPACKE. I am hence trying to sudo port install lapack +accelerate however the build step is failing. I have attached the log file, I can't see an actual error, it looks like everything built fine.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Cc: | Dave-Allured added |
|---|---|
| Owner: | set to tenomoto |
| Status: | new → assigned |
| Summary: | Accelerate variant fails to build → lapack @3.12.0_1+accelerate+gfortran fails to build |
Changed 2 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Attachment: | main.log.bz2 added |
|---|
comment:2 follow-up: 4 Changed 2 years ago by spinicist (Tobias Wood)
Hello, this is my first time reporting an issue on MacPorts. Is there any further help I can provide?
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by Dave-Allured (Dave Allured)
Duplicate of #67262. Please direct further comments there.
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by Dave-Allured (Dave Allured)
Replying to spinicist:
Hello, this is my first time reporting an issue on MacPorts. Is there any further help I can provide?
Thank you for posting main.log. Can you analyze that and provide any insights about that error? It looks like scabs1 is a fortran function included in lapack source code, but is not being built or linked correctly, for some reason. I have not yet found the time to examine your log file. I do not yet understand the context here for leading and trailing underscores.
Follow up to #67262 please.
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by spinicist (Tobias Wood)
Our messages crossed - I just made a post on #67262. I will continue all further discussion there.
comment:6 Changed 9 months ago by cjones051073 (Chris Jones)
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
