#70162 closed update (fixed)
Upgrade LyX to 2.4.x branch
| Reported by: | pmetzger (Perry E. Metzger) | Owned by: | kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | LyX |
Description
LyX 2.3.8 and 2.4.0 have been released. 2.3.8 is a final maintenance release for the 2.3 series, 2.4.0 has dramatic improvements.
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by pmetzger (Perry E. Metzger)
No good reason to keep 2.3.x in my opinion.
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
It is not a bad idea in general to update a port to a final maintenance release of a series before updating to the next major series.
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
Well this might be an issue - I wish they'd gone all out for Qt6
LyX can be built against Qt6 toolkit via --enable-qt6, though this is still considered experimental. Meanwhile Qt5 (the default) remain supported.
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
| Summary: | Upgrade LyX to 2.3.8 or 2.4.0 → Upgrade LyX to 2.4.x branch |
|---|
I updated to 2.3.8. The last time I checked the 2.4 didn't build. And we need to handle Qt5 and Qt6.
comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
comment:7 follow-up: 8 Changed 2 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:8 Changed 2 years ago by barracuda156
Replying to kurthindenburg:
In 4d721f2f60a3bd863e22e9587bc13cd1329b2dca/macports-ports (master):
Thanks for retaining the right version for Qt4!

Is there any reason to keep a 2.3.x version? I'd rather have not have 2 versions to maintain.