Opened 19 years ago

Closed 18 years ago

#3790 closed defect (invalid)

UPDATE: expect-5.43.0

Reported by: mark.duling@… Owned by: IOOI-SqAR
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 1.0
Keywords: Cc: darwinports-bugs@…, olegb@…
Port:

Description

expect-5.43.0

Since the tcl port is now fixed to copy all its headers to ${prefix}/include (see bug 3777), the expect port no longer needs to download tcl to link to the tcl headers.

So I fixed the expect-5.43.0 port to not download tcl and to find the tcl headers that are installed by the fixed tcl port with: --with-tclinclude="${prefix}/include"

A diff file is attached. I tried to assign this to the maintainer iooi@… but I get the message: Assignee: iooi@… did not match anything

Attachments (1)

Portfile.diff (1.6 KB) - added by mark.duling@… 19 years ago.
A unified diff of the proposed changes

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (7)

Changed 19 years ago by mark.duling@…

Attachment: Portfile.diff added

A unified diff of the proposed changes

comment:1 Changed 19 years ago by olegb@…

Cc: olegb@… added
Owner: changed from darwinports-bugs@… to lars.sonchocky-helldorf@…

what says the maintainer?

comment:2 Changed 19 years ago by olegb@…

Cc: darwinports-bugs@… added

adding darwinports-bug-we-love-them-and-want-more@ as cc, because i am gone 2 weeks without IP

comment:3 Changed 19 years ago by mark.duling@…

(In reply to comment #2)

what says the maintainer?

I followed the instructions to assign the bug to him but: Assignee: iooi@… did not match anything

I'm not sure if you're suggesting that I email him directly, but I will.

comment:4 Changed 19 years ago by olegb@…

I followed the instructions to assign the bug to him but: Assignee: iooi@… did not match anything

I'm not sure if you're suggesting that I email him directly, but I will.

It was not critisism, I was just wondering what Lars (who maintains) the port though about the patch, I really think he should give his OK to this (And change the maintaineradress to something bugzilla knows :-) )

comment:5 Changed 19 years ago by mark.duling@…

(In reply to comment #5)

It was not critisism, I was just wondering what Lars (who maintains) the port though about the patch, I really think he should give his OK to this (And change the maintaineradress to something bugzilla knows :-) )

I see. Yes that'd be great if the maintainer could evaluate it. I thought that was perhaps what you meant but I wan't sure. In any case, I didn't take the comments as criticism. Especially since the DarwinPorts folks seem to me to be always courteous.

comment:6 Changed 18 years ago by mark.duling@…

Resolution: invalid
Status: newclosed

It turned out there were wider issues with Tcl headers that made the enhancement I proposed for the expect port not acceptable so I'm closing this bug.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.