Changes between Initial Version and Version 9 of Ticket #6488


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 11, 2009, 9:32:32 AM (15 years ago)
Author:
blb@…
Comment:

Replying to css@…:

Has upstream hfsrsync development stopped entirely?

Looks that way to me, I vote we drop this port. Any objections?

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #6488

    • Property Cc css@… blb@… added
    • Property Summary changed from hfssync doesn't handle missing files well to BUG: hfsrsync-2.5.5 run time issue - can't handle missing files
    • Property Priority changed from Expected to Normal
    • Property Version changed from 1.0 to
    • Property Milestone changed from to Port Bugs
    • Property Port hfsrsync added

  • Ticket #6488 – Description

    initial v9  
    11When a file is removed during hfssync operation, it complains loudly;
    2 
     2{{{
    33hfsrsync(2037) malloc: *** error for object 0x411eb50: double free
    44hfsrsync(2037) malloc: *** set a breakpoint in szone_error to debug
    55send_files failed to open /Users/mnot/Library/Mail/Envelope Index-journal: No such file or directory
    6 
     6}}}
    77Doing this multiple times for every missing file (probably one for each block?).