Ticket #64316: patch-genconditions.diff

gcc/genconditions.c

@@ -57 +57 @@
 \n\
 /* It is necessary, but not entirely safe, to include the headers below\n\
    in a generator program.  As a defensive measure, don't do so when the\n\
-   table isn't going to have anything in it.  */\n\
-#if GCC_VERSION >= 3001\n\
+   table isn't going to have anything in it.\n\
+   Clang 9 is buggy and doesn't handle __builtin_constant_p correctly.  */\n\
+#if GCC_VERSION >= 3001 && __clang_major__ < 9\n\
 \n\
 /* Do not allow checking to confuse the issue.  */\n\
 #undef CHECKING_P\n\
@@ -170 +171 @@
    vary at run time.  It works in 3.0.1 and later; 3.0 only when not\n\
    optimizing.  */\n\
 \n\
-#if GCC_VERSION >= 3001\n\
+#if GCC_VERSION >= 3001 && __clang_major__ < 9\n\
 static const struct c_test insn_conditions[] = {\n");
 
   traverse_c_tests (write_one_condition, 0);
@@ -191 +192 @@
         "  unsigned int i;\n"
         "  const char *p;\n"
         "  puts (\"(define_conditions [\");\n"
-        "#if GCC_VERSION >= 3001\n"
+        "#if GCC_VERSION >= 3001 && __clang_major__ < 9\n"
         "  for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (insn_conditions); i++)\n"
         "    {\n"
         "      printf (\"  (%d \\\"\", insn_conditions[i].value);\n"