Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #36026, comment 17


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 30, 2023, 6:04:59 AM (12 months ago)
Author:
ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #36026, comment 17

    initial v1  
    11Replying to [comment:16 jeremyhu@…]:
    2 > I just rebuilt all of gcc4[345678] with the new ld64 in place, and they were able to build/link test applications just fine.
     2> I just rebuilt all of gcc4![345678] with the new ld64 in place, and they were able to build/link test applications just fine.
    33>
    44> The object file you provided above links just fine and produces an executable which prints:
    … …  
    1111> }}}
    1212>
    13 > Based on comment #14, I've revbumped ld64 to force it to rebuild. cctools-headers and dyld-headers were pushed to svn after ld64 which would explain why I was not able to reproduce it but someone who built within that sliver of time would.  Sorry for that.
     13> Based on comment:14, I've revbumped ld64 to force it to rebuild. cctools-headers and dyld-headers were pushed to svn after ld64 which would explain why I was not able to reproduce it but someone who built within that sliver of time would.  Sorry for that.
    1414>
    15 > I'm assuming that you rebuild ld64 without first syncing and upgrading the headers as the reason why you didn't report success in comment #15.
     15> I'm assuming that you rebuild ld64 without first syncing and upgrading the headers as the reason why you didn't report success in comment:15.
    1616>
    1717> r97646