Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #36733, comment 7
- Timestamp:
- Oct 29, 2012, 7:18:58 PM (12 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #36733, comment 7
initial v1 1 Good points for me to consider, though Apple's LLVM see to have had some serious math issues for a while (check out the Chipmunk Physics forum) but that is all I can legitimately be concerned over that might be fixed by now. I tried using c++ from the command line with the same includes and libs (like as in a Makefile) and the tutorial compiles perfectly. THe examples compile fine with bjam though I shun bjam as an arcane one-off tool in general. However, I worry if I change the compiler in Xcode then I'll have Obj-C issues (sometimes you just cannot win). But your argument that it is Boost more than Apple holds merit. I think I'll make a fork of Boost and maintain on my own too. The GPM lib had the similar problems for a long while largely doe to egos on the key developers. Plus ça change, plus c'est la m ême chose. Thanks for your help and good luck to you with Boost.1 Good points for me to consider, though Apple's LLVM see to have had some serious math issues for a while (check out the Chipmunk Physics forum) but that is all I can legitimately be concerned over that might be fixed by now. I tried using c++ from the command line with the same includes and libs (like as in a Makefile) and the tutorial compiles perfectly. THe examples compile fine with bjam though I shun bjam as an arcane one-off tool in general. However, I worry if I change the compiler in Xcode then I'll have Obj-C issues (sometimes you just cannot win). But your argument that it is Boost more than Apple holds merit. I think I'll make a fork of Boost and maintain on my own too. The GPM lib had the similar problems for a long while largely doe to egos on the key developers. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Thanks for your help and good luck to you with Boost.