Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #48184, comment 4


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 27, 2015, 12:37:21 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
mkae (Marko Käning)
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #48184, comment 4

    initial v1  
     1Replying to [comment:3 rjvbertin@…]:
     2> You're probably better acquainted with building KF5 most all on here, but be careful that you don't end up duplicating lots of stuff.
     3
    14I am still in the process of setting up all those KF5 port files here. (I am in tier 3 by now.)
    25
    … …  
    58Yes, at the moment this port group is only taking care of frameworks, but I want to allow also normal projects depending on some variables set before the PortGroup command (a la {{{${KF5_PROJECT}}}} - which will change meaning soon).
    69
     10> ... I'd strongly advise to use your KDE/CI experience to coerce that script into a portfile.
     11
     12For testing I have half-automatically created about 20 port files now. Of course I will come up with some helper scripts to create the required portfiles. See [https://github.com/haraldF/homebrew-kf5 Haralf Fernengel's HB github repo]!.
     13
     14
    715> There *must* be a KF5 "subset" (a collection of frameworks) that one will have to install anyway in order to run a productivity application (KDevelop, KDE PIM, digiKam, ...).
    816
    9 Yes, there is, but the subset is built up of all those little KF5-ports. Every project has its own subset depending on their requirements.
     17Yes, there is, but the subset is built up of all those little KF5-ports. Every project has its own subset depending on its specific requirements.
    1018
    1119
    … …  
    1927
    2028See above, the current state of the portfile and port group are only transitional and things will change!
    21