Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #55351, comment 3
- Timestamp:
- Nov 20, 2017, 10:55:52 PM (6 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #55351, comment 3
v1 v2 1 If it's in trunk, is that good enough for libgcc-devel? The caveat emptor is documented . Are there other GCC backends in trunk that are explicitly excluded?1 If it's in trunk, is that good enough for libgcc-devel? The caveat emptor is documented, if it's not stale. Are there other GCC backends in trunk that are explicitly excluded? 2 2 Maybe these are good reasons for a separate port dependent on the libgcc-devel port?