Opened 11 years ago

Closed 2 years ago

#24439 closed update (wontfix)

Update arm-rtems-binutils and arm-rtems-gcc

Reported by: jmgc Owned by: macports-tickets@…
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version:
Keywords: haspatch Cc: mkae (Marko Käning), mojca (Mojca Miklavec)
Port: arm-rtems-binutils arm-rtems-gcc

Description

This two portfiles update the arm-rtems-binutils and arm-rtems-gcc to the new rtems 4.9.4.

Attachments (2)

arm-rtems-binutils_Portfile.patch (3.1 KB) - added by jmgc 11 years ago.
Binutils Portfile attachment
arm-rtems-gcc_Portfile.patch (5.8 KB) - added by jmgc 11 years ago.
gcc portfile patch

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (8)

Changed 11 years ago by jmgc

Binutils Portfile attachment

Changed 11 years ago by jmgc

gcc portfile patch

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)

Keywords: haspatch added
Port: arm-rtems-binutils arm-rtems-gcc added
Version: 1.8.2

comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)

Cc: mk@… added

I had a little trouble with the last chunk for arm-rtems-binutils, but that was easily fixable. Why are the checksums uncommented for arm-rtems-binutils?

When I try to use the patch for arm-rtems-gcc I get this:

patching file Portfile
Hunk #5 FAILED at 97.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 129 (offset 5 lines).
Hunk #7 FAILED at 266.
2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Portfile.rej

I didn't do a further analysis, since livecheck shows for both ports much newer version by now.

comment:3 in reply to:  2 Changed 9 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Schmidt)

Replying to mk@…:

Why are the checksums uncommented for arm-rtems-binutils?

You mean commented...

comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)

Yes, of course. :-)

comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by mojca (Mojca Miklavec)

Cc: mojca added

comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by mojca (Mojca Miklavec)

Resolution: wontfix
Status: newclosed

The rtems ports were deleted a while ago, see #31945.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.