Opened 14 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#34339 closed defect (invalid)
gdal +framework variant fails to install
| Reported by: | james.goppert@… | Owned by: | Veence (Vincent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.0.4 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | stromnov (Andrey Stromnov), cooljeanius (Eric Gallager), petrrr | |
| Port: | gdal |
Description
Here is the error.
gdal-1.9.0/libtool --mode=finish --silent /Library/Frameworks/GDAL.framework/Versions/1.9 libtool: finish: invalid argument `/Library/Frameworks/GDAL.framework/Versions/1.9'
Here is a hack to get it to install
mkdir -p /Library/Frameworks/GDAL.framework/Versions/1.9
Now retry port install
sudo port install gdal +framework
Then you have to move it to the correct prefix
mv /Library/Frameworks/GDAL.framework/ /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/GDAL.framework
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by james.goppert@…
| Cc: | james.goppert@… added |
|---|
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to seanasy@… |
|---|---|
| Port: | gdal added |
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Cc: | stromnov@… added |
|---|
Does this still happen with 1.9.1?
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Owner: | changed from seanasy@… to macports-tickets@… |
|---|
This port is no longer maintained. See #44038.
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by petrrr
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to vince@… |
|---|
I assign this to the *new* maintainer. The reporter has not reported back, so I guess, there is a good chance that this ticket can just be closed.
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by Veence (Vincent)
I have really very little time these days, but I’ve never heard of anybody installing Gdal as a framework. I wonder if this option is still maintained upstream.
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by petrrr
Well, I wouldn't to this normally, but I did and could not reproduce this problem. It just looks that depending ports fail to build. So I would just close this ticket if you agree. Of cause, we could also remove this variant completely.
comment:11 Changed 11 years ago by Veence (Vincent)
I think it would be a good idea to remove the variant. In my opinion, it is not relevant any more. Unless, of course, somebody shouts out (s)he is still using it.
comment:12 Changed 11 years ago by petrrr
Maybe it is a good idea to announce the removal on the lists and wait some days for reactions, before proceeding. I doubt you reach the big mass via this ticket ;-).
comment:14 Changed 10 years ago by Veence (Vincent)
| Resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Well, this is way outdated. Closing this ticket. Please reopen if it’s still an issue with 2.1.0
Cc Me!