#55973 closed update (fixed)
demeter, demeter-devel: Update to 0.9.26
| Reported by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | Owned by: | joefowler (Joe Fowler) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | demeter, demeter-devel |
Description
demeter 0.9.26 is available.
$ port livecheck demeter demeter-devel demeter seems to have been updated (port version: 0.9.25, new version: 0.9.26) demeter-devel seems to have been updated (port version: 0.9.25, new version: 0.9.26)
demeter and demeter-devel should be updated to that version. I tried simply updating the version and checksums, but it failed to build.
Attachments (2)
Change History (9)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by joefowler (Joe Fowler)
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by joefowler (Joe Fowler)
Ryan: finally, FINALLY, I have managed to get Demeter version 0.9.26 to build. I am persistent, but not usually this persistent.
It required a source patch, which I will share with the developer. Perhaps it can be incorporated in his next release. But for now, we have to distribute a patch in MacPorts. So I am going to attach TWO patches. One updates our Portfile. One goes in files. Also, two out-of-date patches are there. So I propose:
- Patch the port file with
demeter.diff - Add the file
patch-build-darwin-fix.diffto directory files/ - Remove the other patches
patch-DocBuilder-*.pm.difffrom files/, because they are no longer needed.
Changed 4 years ago by joefowler (Joe Fowler)
| Attachment: | demeter.diff added |
|---|
Changed 4 years ago by joefowler (Joe Fowler)
| Attachment: | patch-build-darwin-fix.diff added |
|---|
Source patch. (Add this to the demeter/files directory)
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by joefowler (Joe Fowler)
The developer issue is at https://github.com/bruceravel/demeter/issues/60
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Thanks! What email address of yours should I attribute this update to when I commit it—the GMail address shown here in Trac, or the NIST address listed in the Portfile?
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by joefowler (Joe Fowler)
Hmm. Either is fine. How about the NIST one from the Portfile.
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by Joe Fowler <joe.fowler@…>
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
I removed the revision 4 line that had been left in the Portfile. I added revision 0 lines since we are moving toward always listing a revision, even when it is 0. I moved the checksums up near the version to match our new style as well.
Yes, it's true that version 0.9.26 is available, but I have not been able to make them build, either.
I have a question in to the Demeter developer, but he hasn't got back to me yet. Anyway, I am working on the problem. The problem appears to have to do with Perl, which I know nothing about. (That might make me a bad choice to be the Demeter maintainer, but that's a different story.)