abcl @1.5.0: No applicable method named getURLs found

[carlofdtam (Carlo Tambuatco)]

Attempted a reinstall of the abcl port under java 10 and the port fails to build. Also unsuccessfully attempted to build port under java 1.8_161 and the port failed to build.

[carlofdtam (Carlo Tambuatco)]

Log file generated under abcl build...

[easye]

abcl will not compile under Java 9 or Java 10.

The port builds find under jdk-1.8.0_162 for me. I see no evidence in the the attached log that jdk-1.8.0_161 was used.

If you have evidence of the port failing to build under a pure JDK8 environment, please attach that log, and I will examine the ticket again.

[carlofdtam (Carlo Tambuatco)]

I have 3 jdk's installed on my system. Java 1.8.0_161, Java 9 and Java 10. My $JAVA_HOME environment variable is set to java 1.8.0_161. However, macports seems to still be using Java 10 to compile this port as evidenced in the logfile. So the question becomes, how do I tell macports to use jdk 1.8.0_161 to build this port?

[kencu (Ken)]

which one do you get by default if you just type java -version ?

On 10.13, all stock, I get this:

$ java -version
java version "1.8.0_131"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_131-b11)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.131-b11, mixed mode)

and abcl builds and runs OK, it seems:

$ abcl
Armed Bear Common Lisp 1.5.0
Java 1.8.0_131 Oracle Corporation
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
Low-level initialization completed in 0.426 seconds.
Startup completed in 2.664 seconds.
Type ":help" for a list of available commands.
CL-USER(1): 

[carlofdtam (Carlo Tambuatco)]

I finally resolved this issue by using

sudo -E port install abcl

My java -version gives

java version "1.8.0_161"

I used the -E flag on sudo to export all environment variables before executing the port command. This finally caused macports to recognize my $JAVA_HOME variable.