Opened 3 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
#63054 closed defect (fixed)
[port abandoned] dvtm
| Reported by: | chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez) | Owned by: | chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | harold@… | |
| Port: | dvtm |
Description
No maintainer activity since submitting this port in 2009 (#21203). Port has been updated and improved several times since then.
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by reneeotten (Renee Otten)
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
I have no interest in this port. I am going along with what https://guide.macports.org/chunked/project.update-policies.html#project.update-policies.abandonment says to do, since I haven’t noticed anything that I would argue allows skipping it in this case (such as a nonexistent MX record for the maintainer’s email address domain).
comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
| Owner: | set to chrstphrchvz |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → fixed |
| Status: | new → closed |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I never really understand the purpose of this type of tickets. Is it that you are interested in becoming the maintainer; if so, just open a PR to indicate that. The only other outcome of a ticket like this is to wait for a few days/weeks and if the maintainer doesn't answer to change this port to
nomaintainer; how does that help for any practical purpose?