#48264 closed enhancement (fixed)
mu-devel @0.9.11.99_7 (mail) +guile variant
| Reported by: | tsd@… | Owned by: | seanfarley (Sean Farley) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.3.3 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: |
Description
Would it be possible to add a variant to mu-devel (and mu, too) so guile support is built-in?
Change History (6)
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 9 years ago by seanfarley (Sean Farley)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to sean@… |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by tsd@…
Replying to sean@…:
Would it be harmful to just always enable guile support?
I don't think it would be harmful, but I don't know.
IIUC many mu users don't use the Guile bindings and consider them expensive.
Tom
comment:3 follow-up: 4 Changed 9 years ago by seanfarley (Sean Farley)
Fair enough. I'll try to get to this Soon™.
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by tsd@…
Replying to sean@…:
Fair enough. I'll try to get to this Soon™.
I heard from the author of mu:
"The only reason not to have guile support is the extra dependency; so if MacPorts takes care of that it should be fine to have mu/guile as the one and only."
hth, Tom
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by seanfarley (Sean Farley)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Should be fixed by r138888.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Technically, this change required the port's revision to be increased. However, since you had just increased the revision in the previous commit 2 seconds prior, that should be ok.
Would it be harmful to just always enable guile support?